Advanced Search «
This week the wheat will be sorted from the chaff in the Democratic and Republican party presidential nomination races, as voters head to the polls in two crucial early states -- Iowa and New Hampshire -- on January 3 and 8, respectively. While neither state will definitively anoint the major party presidential nominees, they will substantially narrow the field of viable contenders.
As the first US state to assess the candidates, Iowa has traditionally been a key gauge of campaign momentum. Both party races in the 'Hawkeye State' are seen as exceptionally close. However, due to the idiosyncratic nature of the caucus system, typically small turnout relative to the total size of the state electorate, and the unprecedented early vote (which led pollsters to call voters over the Christmas-New Year holiday period) the accuracy of opinion surveys is highly questionable:
The candidate that finishes third in the Democratic race will be badly wounded heading into the crucial New Hampshire primary five days later. Among the Republicans, a win for either Romney or Huckabee would be a major boost, although the latter candidate still faces major organisational weaknesses beyond Iowa. A strong third-place finish by McCain could resuscitate his once-fading hopes.
When public attention shifts to New Hampshire following the Iowa result, four trends are likely to emerge:
Obama and Edwards are likely to get a better sense of how vulnerable Clinton is to an upset. If the former beats her into second place in New Hampshire following a tight Iowa contest, the Clinton camp’s big financial donors will begin to waver.
Please rate this article
Quality:
Relevance:
-> Full feedback
The end of the beginning.
Read articles from The World Next Week about this year's presidential election