Advanced Search «
"Few trade policies engender more bitterness and international ill will than the US anti-dumping law."
-- Dan Ikenson, policy analyst, Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute
A dispute over a 'zeroing' -- a protectionist practice that allows Washington to levy artificially high trade tariffs on its trade partners -- is threatening to hold back the much-delayed Doha round of world trade talks. The practice may come under the microscope this Wednesday, as new proposals in a text drafted by Guillermo Valles Galmes, the Uruguayan ambassador chairing World Trade Organisation negotiations, are discussed.
Galmes has made some draft changes to WTO subsidy and anti-dumping rules that have displeased Washington. The United States has insisted that any change to WTO anti-dumping rules must permit 'zeroing' which, critics say, inflates dumping margins and the duties based on them.
Harvard professor of economics Greg Mankiw gives an example of 'zeroing' in miniature:
Galmes's draft text allows zeroing in certain circumstances, but does not go as far as the Washington wants. Senior congressmen have said any trade deal emerging from the Doha round must recognise the practice. Washington's expected intransigence makes the aim to conclude Doha negotiations by the end of 2008 look even more unlikely.
Please rate this article
Quality:
Relevance:
-> Full feedback
Read articles from The World Next Week about this year's presidential election